James Comey Could Be Heading To PRISON

Like this article?

Dean James AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS 

While the lamestream media and the Democrats are rejoicing the fabricated allegations that former FBI Director James Comey has evidence that President Trump attempted obstruct an investigation by asking Comey to dismiss the probe into former aide Gen. Michael Flynn, the reality is that if this is true, Comey may be in a hell of a lot of trouble. 

Big league trouble baby!

Under 18 U.S. Code Section 4, Comey is required by law to report any attempt – including by the president of the United States – to obstruct a federal investigation.

Comey didn’t do that, did he? 

“Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) pointed out that former FBI Director James Comey “appears” to be “confessing to a crime” if allegations surrounding a memo about a conversation with President Trump are true, Fox reports.

“I’m amazed that an FBI director and former prosecutor would be confessing to a crime the way that it appears that he is,” Gohmert said.

“If this [memo] happened a couple of months ago then it sounds [like] he has got to report it immediately and I’ve heard no evidence that he reported [it],” Gohmert said.

Gohmert said Comey appears to have intentionally waited until it was “politically expedient” for the contents of this memo to be released to the press.

“[That] would make it a crime for him,” Gohmert said.

HELL YEAH! LOCK THAT LANKY, HILLARY LOVING SCUMBAG UP!

Join us on Facebook at Nation In Distress

Fox News’ Gregg Jarrett, a former attorney, made a similar case in a recent column on FoxNews.com.

Under the law, Comey is required to immediately inform the Department of Justice of any attempt to obstruct justice by any person, even the President of the United States.  Failure to do so would result in criminal charges against Comey.  (18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361)  He would also, upon sufficient proof, lose his license to practice law.

So, if Comey believed Trump attempted to obstruct justice, did he comply with the law by reporting it to the DOJ?  If not, it calls into question whether the events occurred as the Times reported it.

Obstruction requires what’s called “specific intent” to interfere with a criminal case.  If Comey concluded, however, that Trump’s language was vague, ambiguous or elliptical, then he has no duty under the law to report it because it does not rise to the level of specific intent.  Thus, no crime.

There is no evidence Comey ever alerted officials at the Justice Department, as he is duty-bound to do.  Surely if he had, that incriminating information would have made its way to the public either by an indictment or, more likely, an investigation that could hardly be kept confidential in the intervening months.

But by writing a memo, Comey has put himself in a box. If he now accuses the President of obstruction, he places himself in legal jeopardy for failing to promptly and properly report it.  If he says it was merely an uncomfortable conversation, he clears the president of wrongdoing and sullies his own image as a guy who attempted to smear the man who fired him.

HELL YEAH! SCREW COMEY AND SCREW ALL LIBERALS AND DEMOCRATS!

LET’S SPREAD THIS ALL OVER SOCIAL MEDIA PATRIOTS- WE ARE AT WAR! 

Source- AFF

Here’s How To Be Sure To Continue Seeing Our Content On Facebook

Like this article?

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments